A pre-intervention baseline from the Gender & AI Livelihoods programme — gathered entirely over standard phone calls, in participants' own words. No smartphone, no internet, no enumerators.
In the markets, kiosks and tailoring shops of Nairobi and Eldoret, women are running real businesses against real odds. They know their trade. What they rarely get is someone in their corner week after week — a coach to think through a pricing decision, a slow month, a chance to grow.
Training exists, and it helps. But it fades. The advice that lands in a workshop rarely survives the rush of the next trading day, and the digital tools meant to fill the gap assume a smartphone, an app, a data bundle — things much of this population doesn't have.
So we asked a simple question: what if every woman could have a coach she calls from the phone already in her hand?
That's the Gender & AI Livelihoods programme — funded by the Gates Foundation, led by Shortlist Futures, and delivered on the ground with Inkomoko, one of East Africa's most established entrepreneur-support organisations. Fortell built the voice AI that makes it reach. This report is where that story begins: who these women are, before the coaching.
One engagement, three layers of evidence — what happened, what changed, and what it meant. This baseline is built across all three.
Demographic and outreach data establishing who the programme served — and whether it reached its intended population.
Structured indicator data mapped to your reporting requirements, collected directly from the people your programme reached — in any language.
Open-ended responses in people's own words — what changed for them beyond the measurable indicators.
The 118 women are working-age, experienced entrepreneurs: Kenyan host-community members alongside urban-based refugees from Somalia, Congo, Ethiopia, Rwanda and Burundi, spanning no formal schooling to university degrees.
Nearly half live in peri-urban or rural areas with limited business support — exactly the population most digital tools leave out. A single, language-accessible voice instrument reached all of them.
Layer 02 maps directly to the programme's reporting requirements: income, financial behaviour, confidence, growth barriers and decision-making, each collected on its own valid-response base.
The picture is a capable but capital-constrained cohort: most track costs and save, yet 87% find earnings only sometimes or rarely sufficient, and income smoothing is the clear coaching target.
At baseline these are the counterfactual — the numbers we'll measure change against when the same instrument runs at endline.
Every call closed with open questions. The answers are where the data becomes a person — the reason for a number, the next step they already know they need to take.
And because the survey itself was a spoken conversation, the Voice layer isn't only a transcript — it's how the cohort sounded.
A snapshot doesn't change a business. So from June 2026, the same women are receiving weekly coaching calls from the AI agent — each one personalised from their own profile, sector and baseline answers.
The curriculum is Inkomoko's, proven on the ground: pricing, cost control, customer management, record-keeping and market access. What the voice AI adds is the part training usually can't — showing up every week to turn knowing into doing.
Each call runs a simple loop, the engine behind real behaviour change:
The same VoicePrint instrument runs again after coaching — and we'll publish what changed, layer by layer. Leave your email and we'll send it when it lands.